Truth
Proof of God and religious doctrines of absolute clerical rule in polynomial
The first is to say that in Islam, the principles of religion, unlike Christianity, is not imitation Ijtihad. Nobody should be no reason to accept anything.
Argument Sino (Avicenna) is the following existence is necessary.
Says or indifferent beings or Being Alvjvdnd Alvjvdnd or obligatory. Being indifferent to his existence is impossible (there is no such possibility is that the number is even or odd). It is self-existent being (not possible when there is none. Was and is and will always be there for him, it is obligatory) and it is possible Being can and can not. Necessary existence is not impossible. That came later, not earlier. Like all creatures in this world. So what we see, or is or may be self-existent Being.
Our assumption is that in this world there is something or things sophists claim, nothing in the world is nothing (although nothing in the world that even if you say no, is there anything that you accepted the world., And perceived Do you think that the world itself is a., and you can not have no idea. then the world is that you have an idea of it. course, vary with the Sydalshhda Hadith said, all the fun and pain in this world is but a dream. they dream, nothing).
At least one of the judges ask and what type? Our claim is proved if you say it is self-existent. And if you say it is possible Being part of where we come from? If you tell other organisms. There will repeat his question about the existence of what kind is it? Or obligatory? If you want to continue to have an infinite regress of causes is infinite you may say that is impossible.. So either tell the other material made available, in which case we ask that exists where it came from? And finally an infinite regress of causes is impossible here. Once all the material things, the first time they had been before. And here, if you say he himself has created it. Because of this, it requires that there be before it came into existence and has created his own!If you are a nature that was not ever away from her! That was his nature must always exist if there were not, then there would not be used. Because of the inherent nature of a present, but it is not available. The existence of another creature, which is outside of nature.And if you want to be infinite, with infinite regress of causes is impossible that you. So that perforce must do a self-existence, nature is the end of me. And you admit to the existence of the Necessary Being.
Sadraee argument: our sight and mind, it is clear that there is such thing there. There's also the original concept to us, quite clearly, that is not quite the contrary, so that there are absolute.is absolute., and what is his own Mtlqsh is the absolute kindness and absolute power and absolute knowledge and absolute justice Wo ... / / / / Of course, this does not mean that God, born of our minds! (erection Billah).Meaning of each entity, albeit incomplete, and that there is no opposition there, but because all the creatures that we see, a kind of deficiency needs are limited, so none of these things; can not have any real meaning. Although the terms are not, but in terms of there being no sense, because there can not exist unless absolutely. And if there was not absolute, that, even for a moment, could not appear and neither does the continuing existence. Because there's no sense whatsoever. So Vjvdhayy are absolutely dependent. (Of poverty) "or Ayhaalnas Antm Alfqra’ Hvalghny Alhmyd God to God." The incomplete nature of Being, because Being is complete. / / / / We own the concept of good and bad because we clearly and without saying, we know. Justice, beauty and truth, science, and the power of good and evil, injustice, ugliness and lies, ignorance and lack of know. It is and will always and everywhere. The absolute values are good.Now the issue is that good or bad Dadr authenticity? Which is existential? Respond to this discussion makes it clear that there is an absolute (ie God), is absolute good or absolute evil. We see two people ignorant of one another and the world. The main question is: Is it ignorance, but what is science? (And genuinely good science is), or science, but is not ignorance? It is clear that ignorance is but a lack of knowledge. And is there knowledge nor ignorance. Science is really (and not metaphorically) is better not ignorance. And once we have a better word for someone who has more knowledge we used (rather than ignorance), that we have accepted the authenticity of the well. That we never say ignorant, but always say the world is better than reality. And no ignorance, shortcomings and said that there is absolutely no any deficiency. And absolutely, all the good things that we know are at the highest level. That is the limit. Science is absolute and omniscient. His absolute power and mercy and truth and beauty and justice. "Ftbark Allah, Lord of the worlds." So the devil is evil human enemies, there can not be absolute and God. Dog is God's kingdom, but expelled. Two Zoroastrian god Ahura Mazda and Ahriman, then the basis is wrong. / / / / Bad, or nothing but not good enough. And this is bad or evils, are relative and absolute evil does not exist. Whatever it is, is good, but the degree of existence, and the existence of lower intensity than in high levels, are evil (evil relative). But any creature with any degree of existence than not, it is absolutely good and perfect. Even the accursed Satan, the evil is not absolute. So well, originality there. / / / / And the concept in our minds, no more and no Diversity is not the same thing, then there absolutely is a unique and simple. (Ie, composed of simple not parts). Dvyyty in nature and there is no difference. Since the creation of our world, we see Diversity and Dvyytha them is evident, plus the deficiency of Srtapayshan raining, so none of these, nor all of them together, there is not complete . The whole thing is nothing but the sum of the individual components, and the components are defective, incomplete and poorly Kmbvddarha Mjmvshan be set. In addition to this collection, there is no unity. In addition, any component part of a whole combination alone, without consideration of the other components, even without considering the whole, while it is impossible to imagine there could be incomplete without considering the Being of God (being absolute), ie without the need for independent than he imagined. And even if there were absolute (thought impossible, not impossible), then the other, because none had absolute power, which agrees with his power, his power to fulfill his will was thwarted and hindered or had the potential However, absolute power, and the other was not. While it is clear that there is an absolute. So is Qadrmtlq (although all the characters in absolute terms) and also where if somebody says that God not another? He must prove his claim by reason and if it was another god, the work (an Envoy, a book, anything) than he was.For example, an apple, an apple tree and the tree, the fruit trees and old, as well as go back. Finally, these materials must reach the initial moment before that moment, they were not. Otherwise, the sequence goes to infinity and you go back, there will be no first tree to keep the tree from which they emerged. Even if you tell the whole world as a single cell emerged ask where it came from? Opening moment and ask where it came from? If Hvdsh he created himself, the word implies that it is available before opening time (ie before the coming into existence) exist, and have made it! And around that is revoked (ask around the "a" Where did that come from? Say the "b." Ask good "B" Where did that come from? Say the "c." Ask "c" where it came from ? say the "A"). The matter is Ghyrmadh and the material world, and the reason is immaterial. / / / / So we can conclude that there is an absolute non-material existence, and the existence of other limits that have arisen. Because every substance, not long after emerged and was previously no absolute (according to Aristotle's argument) If suddenly something comes of this, a move is a move, and the movement of an entity that is the question Where was this movement and mobility?Then move it where it came from? Momentum transfer, the transferor is something that we need to drive and move it ask where it came from?So the motion is limited and we ask that no absolute, what was the motor? Since there was no time to move, so he can not be his own creator. Again we ask, then move it where it came from? Was it not absolutely say no? And there was absolutely nothing? Although never an absolute failure (including travel) will not be issued. It's not absolute, though it may not be the smallest or least move happen. And if it was not absolute, it was not something that would never (and will never) appear. The end result is that the first move of the first female and the first incomplete, can never be an absolute failure.(Of course, maybe I'm bad, I take Aristotle's argument) / / / / And suddenly someone says, where there happened to be no explanation for the move?It was argued that there was no logical reason for it. As we discussed in a rational and reasonable person, and because the table that the debate "because it is assumed that because the proof is everywhere and everything."when your talking out of the general rule has exceptions, because the dream. Why not bring her over to us. Albynh Ali Almdy. He has alleged that the manner all wise people "accept the authority in all cases because it" has been perverted and betrayed. So he does not have the right to say "where it first found, quite suddenly and for no reason should not exist". Under Armor is like someone who says this armor is not yours is mine./ / / / When a rational argument (which is a general discussion, head) Got wise God is absolute, then all actions and Khlqtsh, wisdom, and if you did not understand what the reason and wisdom, because it is not in vain. You're not the whole reason. Details and World Affairs, have wisdom. God is just. Justice means putting everything in its proper place.So he sends messengers to the ultimatum and to prevent cruelty to other humans (with the judge's ruling and put the prophets and successors) take.are human whim. And often vulgar Frybkartryn who can score and get better people in election systems, human power to reach the top positions. Because most people, the true reformer who stands in front of the weaknesses and biases of the people and society, do not like. To prove Nbvtshan prophets, miracles are. The miraculous thing that people deal with it, fail. This is a sign. And now only the miracle of all religions, the Holy Quran. 14th century all the jinn and humankind who have failed to respond to an opponent, and even a chapter of the Koran, as the Koran bring justice. Miracle of Quran, the literal sense; together (together) is. / / / / This is the only way to heaven: Prophets (AS), and then seal Alnbyyn (p), as he said, his successors are the twelve Imams.And even individual leaders of this series, is available on.Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Hosseini Khamenei, Ayatollah Al Radwan.(because they do not believe in thee until we see God with their eyes. "Len Neumann smudge even Jhrh male God" so obviously they were not believed) and had been tortured. So people can not choose their leader, "By God, we Ykhlq Ysha’ and Ykhtar Lhm Alkhyrh Makan" and the Assembly of Experts, according to Imam Khomeini, Ayatollah Khamenei (Hfzh God) has introduced a revolutionary leader, the imam who virtue of their not saying anything contrary, it is assumed that the supreme Shiite leader, the Imam (Jl's deadline), and scientific and Bazn God Allah he is elected Assembly of Experts, the only people person and community provider. Criterion of faith and disbelief, as the Prophet (PBUH) in the province of Ali (AS) said, and that is only the vulnerable provinces. Criterion of right and wrong, but those are the province of the place and the person is in this position. Because there infallibility, it is necessary for him (successor Prophets Hammam is the place to fight the people astray.), Not the absolute infallibility of the verse catharsis, a 14 is innocent. Shiites and Sunnis quote the Prophet (SAW) that "s my better nation prophets of Israel" (book "Peshawar Nights" Mr. Sultan Alvazyn Shirazi, in vindication of Shia versus Sunni, Shia scholar is enough in the world debate Age-all ages with their traditions, in all matters of dispute, and condemn them in the market and is available Bvfvr Internet). / / / / / Imam Khomeini (ra) was that the president should be installed directly by the supreme leader (not enforceable) otherwise is idolatrous. Unfortunately Imam wrote, "For a lot of men do not disagree with intellectuals, came short."did the Supreme Assembly of Experts. And again stressed the authority of the supreme leader and the short guys in this discussion!We see that. Take the form of self-coup election Ghaylh Brkhyshan power struggle and incompetence and theft and ooh .... (Of course, one does not disappoint and Brnkhvrd anyone. But still did not do anything and they said no.) The yogurt yogurt. It held that the arbitration Ghaylh Siffin war, Amr (one of the disciples and companions of Imam particular) came to the Imam and said: "Sir, I have no idea myself. Consider me your opinion." Imam said: "I wish I had hundreds of people like you." Imam Sajjad Ali said there was around 40 believers.I accept your word. " Iman sketched. Islam and sketched and sketched and sketched AL ERFAN delivery. And if I got that night, the day he is supreme, God will accept. www.velayat133.blogfa.com
Another more important question: Who says "Where the world is not an accident?"
The first is to say that in Islam, the principles of religion, unlike Christianity, is not imitation Ijtihad. Nobody should be no reason to accept anything.
Argument Sino (Avicenna) is the following existence is necessary.
Says or indifferent beings or Being Alvjvdnd Alvjvdnd or obligatory. Being indifferent to his existence is impossible (there is no such possibility is that the number is even or odd). It is self-existent being (not possible when there is none. Was and is and will always be there for him, it is obligatory) and it is possible Being can and can not. Necessary existence is not impossible. That came later, not earlier. Like all creatures in this world. So what we see, or is or may be self-existent Being.
Our assumption is that in this world there is something or things sophists claim, nothing in the world is nothing (although nothing in the world that even if you say no, is there anything that you accepted the world., And perceived Do you think that the world itself is a., and you can not have no idea. then the world is that you have an idea of it. course, vary with the Sydalshhda Hadith said, all the fun and pain in this world is but a dream. they dream, nothing).
At least one of the judges ask and what type? Our claim is proved if you say it is self-existent. And if you say it is possible Being part of where we come from? If you tell other organisms. There will repeat his question about the existence of what kind is it? Or obligatory? If you want to continue to have an infinite regress of causes is infinite you may say that is impossible.. So either tell the other material made available, in which case we ask that exists where it came from? And finally an infinite regress of causes is impossible here. Once all the material things, the first time they had been before. And here, if you say he himself has created it. Because of this, it requires that there be before it came into existence and has created his own!If you are a nature that was not ever away from her! That was his nature must always exist if there were not, then there would not be used. Because of the inherent nature of a present, but it is not available. The existence of another creature, which is outside of nature.And if you want to be infinite, with infinite regress of causes is impossible that you. So that perforce must do a self-existence, nature is the end of me. And you admit to the existence of the Necessary Being.
Sadraee argument: our sight and mind, it is clear that there is such thing there. There's also the original concept to us, quite clearly, that is not quite the contrary, so that there are absolute.is absolute., and what is his own Mtlqsh is the absolute kindness and absolute power and absolute knowledge and absolute justice Wo ... / / / / Of course, this does not mean that God, born of our minds! (erection Billah).Meaning of each entity, albeit incomplete, and that there is no opposition there, but because all the creatures that we see, a kind of deficiency needs are limited, so none of these things; can not have any real meaning. Although the terms are not, but in terms of there being no sense, because there can not exist unless absolutely. And if there was not absolute, that, even for a moment, could not appear and neither does the continuing existence. Because there's no sense whatsoever. So Vjvdhayy are absolutely dependent. (Of poverty) "or Ayhaalnas Antm Alfqra’ Hvalghny Alhmyd God to God." The incomplete nature of Being, because Being is complete. / / / / We own the concept of good and bad because we clearly and without saying, we know. Justice, beauty and truth, science, and the power of good and evil, injustice, ugliness and lies, ignorance and lack of know. It is and will always and everywhere. The absolute values are good.Now the issue is that good or bad Dadr authenticity? Which is existential? Respond to this discussion makes it clear that there is an absolute (ie God), is absolute good or absolute evil. We see two people ignorant of one another and the world. The main question is: Is it ignorance, but what is science? (And genuinely good science is), or science, but is not ignorance? It is clear that ignorance is but a lack of knowledge. And is there knowledge nor ignorance. Science is really (and not metaphorically) is better not ignorance. And once we have a better word for someone who has more knowledge we used (rather than ignorance), that we have accepted the authenticity of the well. That we never say ignorant, but always say the world is better than reality. And no ignorance, shortcomings and said that there is absolutely no any deficiency. And absolutely, all the good things that we know are at the highest level. That is the limit. Science is absolute and omniscient. His absolute power and mercy and truth and beauty and justice. "Ftbark Allah, Lord of the worlds." So the devil is evil human enemies, there can not be absolute and God. Dog is God's kingdom, but expelled. Two Zoroastrian god Ahura Mazda and Ahriman, then the basis is wrong. / / / / Bad, or nothing but not good enough. And this is bad or evils, are relative and absolute evil does not exist. Whatever it is, is good, but the degree of existence, and the existence of lower intensity than in high levels, are evil (evil relative). But any creature with any degree of existence than not, it is absolutely good and perfect. Even the accursed Satan, the evil is not absolute. So well, originality there. / / / / And the concept in our minds, no more and no Diversity is not the same thing, then there absolutely is a unique and simple. (Ie, composed of simple not parts). Dvyyty in nature and there is no difference. Since the creation of our world, we see Diversity and Dvyytha them is evident, plus the deficiency of Srtapayshan raining, so none of these, nor all of them together, there is not complete . The whole thing is nothing but the sum of the individual components, and the components are defective, incomplete and poorly Kmbvddarha Mjmvshan be set. In addition to this collection, there is no unity. In addition, any component part of a whole combination alone, without consideration of the other components, even without considering the whole, while it is impossible to imagine there could be incomplete without considering the Being of God (being absolute), ie without the need for independent than he imagined. And even if there were absolute (thought impossible, not impossible), then the other, because none had absolute power, which agrees with his power, his power to fulfill his will was thwarted and hindered or had the potential However, absolute power, and the other was not. While it is clear that there is an absolute. So is Qadrmtlq (although all the characters in absolute terms) and also where if somebody says that God not another? He must prove his claim by reason and if it was another god, the work (an Envoy, a book, anything) than he was.For example, an apple, an apple tree and the tree, the fruit trees and old, as well as go back. Finally, these materials must reach the initial moment before that moment, they were not. Otherwise, the sequence goes to infinity and you go back, there will be no first tree to keep the tree from which they emerged. Even if you tell the whole world as a single cell emerged ask where it came from? Opening moment and ask where it came from? If Hvdsh he created himself, the word implies that it is available before opening time (ie before the coming into existence) exist, and have made it! And around that is revoked (ask around the "a" Where did that come from? Say the "b." Ask good "B" Where did that come from? Say the "c." Ask "c" where it came from ? say the "A"). The matter is Ghyrmadh and the material world, and the reason is immaterial. / / / / So we can conclude that there is an absolute non-material existence, and the existence of other limits that have arisen. Because every substance, not long after emerged and was previously no absolute (according to Aristotle's argument) If suddenly something comes of this, a move is a move, and the movement of an entity that is the question Where was this movement and mobility?Then move it where it came from? Momentum transfer, the transferor is something that we need to drive and move it ask where it came from?So the motion is limited and we ask that no absolute, what was the motor? Since there was no time to move, so he can not be his own creator. Again we ask, then move it where it came from? Was it not absolutely say no? And there was absolutely nothing? Although never an absolute failure (including travel) will not be issued. It's not absolute, though it may not be the smallest or least move happen. And if it was not absolute, it was not something that would never (and will never) appear. The end result is that the first move of the first female and the first incomplete, can never be an absolute failure.(Of course, maybe I'm bad, I take Aristotle's argument) / / / / And suddenly someone says, where there happened to be no explanation for the move?It was argued that there was no logical reason for it. As we discussed in a rational and reasonable person, and because the table that the debate "because it is assumed that because the proof is everywhere and everything."when your talking out of the general rule has exceptions, because the dream. Why not bring her over to us. Albynh Ali Almdy. He has alleged that the manner all wise people "accept the authority in all cases because it" has been perverted and betrayed. So he does not have the right to say "where it first found, quite suddenly and for no reason should not exist". Under Armor is like someone who says this armor is not yours is mine./ / / / When a rational argument (which is a general discussion, head) Got wise God is absolute, then all actions and Khlqtsh, wisdom, and if you did not understand what the reason and wisdom, because it is not in vain. You're not the whole reason. Details and World Affairs, have wisdom. God is just. Justice means putting everything in its proper place.So he sends messengers to the ultimatum and to prevent cruelty to other humans (with the judge's ruling and put the prophets and successors) take.are human whim. And often vulgar Frybkartryn who can score and get better people in election systems, human power to reach the top positions. Because most people, the true reformer who stands in front of the weaknesses and biases of the people and society, do not like. To prove Nbvtshan prophets, miracles are. The miraculous thing that people deal with it, fail. This is a sign. And now only the miracle of all religions, the Holy Quran. 14th century all the jinn and humankind who have failed to respond to an opponent, and even a chapter of the Koran, as the Koran bring justice. Miracle of Quran, the literal sense; together (together) is. / / / / This is the only way to heaven: Prophets (AS), and then seal Alnbyyn (p), as he said, his successors are the twelve Imams.And even individual leaders of this series, is available on.Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Hosseini Khamenei, Ayatollah Al Radwan.(because they do not believe in thee until we see God with their eyes. "Len Neumann smudge even Jhrh male God" so obviously they were not believed) and had been tortured. So people can not choose their leader, "By God, we Ykhlq Ysha’ and Ykhtar Lhm Alkhyrh Makan" and the Assembly of Experts, according to Imam Khomeini, Ayatollah Khamenei (Hfzh God) has introduced a revolutionary leader, the imam who virtue of their not saying anything contrary, it is assumed that the supreme Shiite leader, the Imam (Jl's deadline), and scientific and Bazn God Allah he is elected Assembly of Experts, the only people person and community provider. Criterion of faith and disbelief, as the Prophet (PBUH) in the province of Ali (AS) said, and that is only the vulnerable provinces. Criterion of right and wrong, but those are the province of the place and the person is in this position. Because there infallibility, it is necessary for him (successor Prophets Hammam is the place to fight the people astray.), Not the absolute infallibility of the verse catharsis, a 14 is innocent. Shiites and Sunnis quote the Prophet (SAW) that "s my better nation prophets of Israel" (book "Peshawar Nights" Mr. Sultan Alvazyn Shirazi, in vindication of Shia versus Sunni, Shia scholar is enough in the world debate Age-all ages with their traditions, in all matters of dispute, and condemn them in the market and is available Bvfvr Internet). / / / / / Imam Khomeini (ra) was that the president should be installed directly by the supreme leader (not enforceable) otherwise is idolatrous. Unfortunately Imam wrote, "For a lot of men do not disagree with intellectuals, came short."did the Supreme Assembly of Experts. And again stressed the authority of the supreme leader and the short guys in this discussion!We see that. Take the form of self-coup election Ghaylh Brkhyshan power struggle and incompetence and theft and ooh .... (Of course, one does not disappoint and Brnkhvrd anyone. But still did not do anything and they said no.) The yogurt yogurt. It held that the arbitration Ghaylh Siffin war, Amr (one of the disciples and companions of Imam particular) came to the Imam and said: "Sir, I have no idea myself. Consider me your opinion." Imam said: "I wish I had hundreds of people like you." Imam Sajjad Ali said there was around 40 believers.I accept your word. " Iman sketched. Islam and sketched and sketched and sketched AL ERFAN delivery. And if I got that night, the day he is supreme, God will accept. www.velayat133.blogfa.com
Another more important question: Who says "Where the world is not an accident?"
+ نوشته شده در پنجشنبه دوازدهم بهمن ۱۳۹۱ ساعت 20:34 توسط محمد
|
